|
How Planned
Collaborative Efforts Can Decrease Surgical Site Infection
Rates
A multi-center study(1)
involving over 56 hospitals in 50 American states and
U.S. territories in 2002-2003 clearly presented that
systematic, collaborative efforts can significantly
decrease surgical site infections. As a major preventable
cause of morbidity and mortality in most hospitals,
surgical site infections occur in an estimated 780,000
procedures each year. Although the number of infections
following minor procedures such as intravenous line
placements and simple outpatient procedures often tend
to be underestimated, the results can be equally disastrous
in the elderly and immune compromised.
By meticulously adopting
proven techniques to cut down on surgically acquired
infections, infections rates fell by a full 27% during
the period of this study. Although this study focused
mainly on the use of antibiotics for prophylaxis, other
studies have looked at many other aspects. A key 2001
report "Making health care safer: a critical analysis
of patient safety practices" by the Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality(2) found that evidence in favor
of the appropriate use of antibiotic prophylaxis in
surgical patients and the use of maximal sterile barriers
during the placement of central venous catheters was
overwhelming.
More recently, strong
support for a collaborative model in combating hospital
acquired infections demonstrated as much as an 85% decline
in MRSA infection rates(3). Simple measures, such as
those used in Northern Europe and included swabbing
patients and healthcare workers for MRSA, meticulous
barrier methods and hand washing, proved to be highly
effective in the North American context. Of the two
million hospital acquired infections in the USA every
year, nearly 70% are resistant to antibiotics. As a
result, collaborative efforts are the only practical
methods to deal with this crisis of epidemic proportions.
References
(1) http://www.ahqa.org/pub/media/159_678_5198.cfm
(2) Making health care safer: a critical analysis of
patient safety practices. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ)
2001;43:1-668.
(3) http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0NUZ/is_12_12/ai_n15932704
The consumer health information
on this Website is for informational and educational
purposes only and is not a substitute for medical advice
or treatment for any medical conditions.
|